1949 Ford Custom vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Ford Custom (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Ford Custom should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 1949 Ford Custom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Ford Custom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Ford Custom | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Custom | 626 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |