1949 Ford Custom vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1949 Ford Custom. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1949 Ford Custom.
Because 1949 Ford Custom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Ford Custom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Ford Custom | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Custom | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |
