1949 Ford F vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Ford F would be higher.
Because 1949 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Ford F | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F | 6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |