1949 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1949 Ford Taunus. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 926 kg more than 1949 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Ford Taunus | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Taunus | CTS |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2880 mm |