1949 GAZ M-20 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,118 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1949 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1949 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph Vitesse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1949 GAZ M-20 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | GAZ | Triumph |
Model | M-20 | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2118 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2330 mm |