1949 GAZ M-20 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,118 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1949 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1949 GAZ M-20.
Because 1949 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 GAZ M-20 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | GAZ | Renault |
| Model | M-20 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2118 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |
