1949 GAZ M-20 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,118 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1949 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1949 GAZ M-20.
Because 1949 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1949 GAZ M-20 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | GAZ | Volkswagen |
Model | M-20 | Polo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2118 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2470 mm |