1949 Holden FX vs. 1976 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1976 Zastava 1300 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 1300 (59 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Holden FX weights approximately 12 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1949 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Holden FX | 1976 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | FX | 1300 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |