1949 Holden FX vs. 2005 Mazda 6

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 546 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: