1949 Holden FX vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX.
Because 1949 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Holden FX | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | FX | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
