1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 1964 Morris Mini Moke
To start off, 1964 Morris Mini Moke is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Morris Mini Moke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 1964 Morris Mini Moke | |
Make | Hudson | Morris |
Model | Commodore | Mini Moke |
Year Released | 1949 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2040 mm |