1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 336 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Hudson | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Commodore | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2680 mm |
