1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 1982 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1982 Toyota Tercel is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 836 kg more than 1982 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 1982 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Hudson | Toyota |
| Model | Commodore | Tercel |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2510 mm |
