1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 Toyota Celica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 561 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Hudson | Toyota |
Model | Commodore | Celica |
Year Released | 1949 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |