1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 1996 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Golf. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Golf.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 1996 Volkswagen Golf | |
| Make | Hudson | Volkswagen |
| Model | Commodore | Golf |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 92.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2480 mm |
