1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2002 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 431 kg more than 2002 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2002 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Hudson | Hyundai |
| Model | Commodore | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2610 mm |
