1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2003 TVR T 350
To start off, 2003 TVR T 350 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 TVR T 350 (346 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 552 kg more than 2003 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2003 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Hudson | TVR |
| Model | Commodore | T 350 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 3605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 346 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2370 mm |
