1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 156 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Hudson | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Commodore | CLK |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 5441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 362 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1812 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2860 mm |
