1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 355 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Hudson Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Hudson | Mercury |
Model | Commodore | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 210 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 2011 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2900 mm |