1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse (145 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 246 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 2005 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
Model | Commodore | Eclipse |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 2350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2570 mm |