1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (127 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 348 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Hudson | Isuzu |
| Model | Commodore | KB |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 2405 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3060 mm |
