1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 406 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Commodore | Colt |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 2834 cc |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 21.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2970 mm |
