1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2008 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2008 Opel Meriva is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 336 kg more than 2008 Opel Meriva.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2008 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Hudson | Opel |
| Model | Commodore | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 88.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2640 mm |
