1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Hudson | Mitsubishi |
Model | Commodore | Lancer |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2640 mm |