1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2009 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2009 Nissan Altima is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Altima (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 102 kg more than 2009 Nissan Altima.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Altima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Hudson Commodore | 2009 Nissan Altima | |
Make | Hudson | Nissan |
Model | Commodore | Altima |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4166 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1554 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2680 mm |