1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2010 Aston Martin DBS
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin DBS weights approximately 39 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2010 Aston Martin DBS | |
| Make | Hudson | Aston Martin |
| Model | Commodore | DBS |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4722 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1905 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2741 mm |
