1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Hudson | Dodge |
| Model | Commodore | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 100 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3340 mm |
