1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1949 Hudson Commodore has manual transmission. 1949 Hudson Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Hudson | Jaguar |
| Model | Commodore | XF |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 271 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2908 mm |
