1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 668 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2013 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Hudson | Aston Martin |
| Model | Commodore | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 80 mm |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 988 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3078 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2000 mm |
