1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Hudson | Chevrolet |
| Model | Commodore | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 10.7 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1918 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2852 mm |
