1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1949 Jaguar Mark IV.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Mark IV | 6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2680 mm |