1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Mark IV | 3 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2650 mm |