1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 362 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jaguar Mark IV (250 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1949 Jaguar Mark IV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | Mark IV | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3483 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2710 mm |