1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 10 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | Mark IV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1776 cc | 2946 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2520 mm |
