1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 586 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
| Model | Mark IV | Polo |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
