1949 Jaguar Mark IV vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 45 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar Mark IV | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | Mark IV | Matrix |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1776 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 132 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2601 mm |