1949 Jaguar MK V vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1949 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1949 Jaguar MK V.
Because 1949 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar MK V | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jaguar | Volkswagen |
Model | MK V | Polo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3485 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |