1949 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar XK | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XK | CL |
Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |