1949 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jaguar XK | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XK | Ranger |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3010 mm |