1949 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XK | 6 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |
