1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 450 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Jeep | Lotus |
| Model | CJ2A | Elan |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2140 mm |
