1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1967 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1967 Toyota Corolla is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 390 kg more than 1967 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1967 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ2A | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1077 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |
