1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 1976 Volvo 240 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 240 (81 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ2A | 240 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |