1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1982 Opel Corsa
To start off, 1982 Opel Corsa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Corsa (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Corsa should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Opel Corsa.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Corsa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Corsa. (102 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1982 Opel Corsa | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | CJ2A | Corsa |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2350 mm |
