1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1982 Seat Ronda is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 230 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | CJ2A | Ronda |
Year Released | 1949 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |