1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 1988 Lada Samara
To start off, 1988 Lada Samara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Lada Samara (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 190 kg more than 1988 Lada Samara.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Lada Samara. (117 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 1988 Lada Samara | |
| Make | Jeep | Lada |
| Model | CJ2A | Samara |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |
