1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2001 Kia Visto
To start off, 2001 Kia Visto is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Kia Visto (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Kia Visto should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 306 kg more than 2001 Kia Visto.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Kia Visto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Kia Visto. (103 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Kia Visto.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2001 Kia Visto | |
Make | Jeep | Kia |
Model | CJ2A | Visto |
Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 804 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2390 mm |