1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2001 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2001 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,290 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Saab 03-Sep (227 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Saab 03-Sep. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Saab 03-Sep (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2001 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2001 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Jeep | Saab |
| Model | CJ2A | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 227 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |
