1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 403 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | CJ2A | Sable |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 251 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |