1949 Jeep CJ2A vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Jeep CJ2A | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | CJ2A | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2490 mm |